Seven families whose children were killed or injured in the Tumbler Ridge school shooting in Canada have filed lawsuits against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman. The core accusation is simple and damning: OpenAI knew the suspected shooter, 18-year-old Jesse Van Rootselaar, was using ChatGPT to discuss gun violence in the weeks before the attack. The company allegedly flagged the activity internally but deliberately chose not to alert police.
The families argue OpenAI stayed quiet to protect its reputation and avoid jeopardizing its upcoming initial public offering (IPO). According to The Wall Street Journal, the company “considered” reporting Van Rootselaar’s activity to law enforcement but ultimately decided against it. That’s a hell of a choice to make when you have a teenager openly talking about shooting up a school on your platform.
Let me be clear: I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t know how this will play out in court. But morally, this stinks. OpenAI has spent years positioning itself as the responsible AI company, the one that cares about safety. They’ve hired ethicists, published safety frameworks, and testified before Congress about how seriously they take risks. Yet here we are, with families burying their children and a company that apparently couldn’t be bothered to make a phone call.

The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI’s internal systems flagged Van Rootselaar’s conversations, which included detailed discussions about firearms, targets, and the logistics of carrying out a mass shooting. Instead of notifying authorities, the company sat on the information. The families claim this was a calculated decision driven by fear that any public connection between ChatGPT and a school shooting would tank investor confidence ahead of the IPO.
And honestly, that tracks. OpenAI has been on an aggressive commercial push, moving from a nonprofit research lab to a for-profit juggernaut. An IPO would be the crown jewel of that transformation. A scandal like this — a school shooter using your product to plan an attack — would be a disaster for the stock price. So they rolled the dice and lost. Except the loss wasn’t theirs to take; it was paid in blood by the people of Tumbler Ridge.
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen tech companies prioritize business interests over user safety. Social media platforms have been doing it for years, and we’ve seen the consequences in everything from election interference to youth mental health crises. But there’s something particularly gut-wrenching about an AI company — a company that claims to be building technology for the benefit of humanity — choosing to stay silent when they had the chance to stop a tragedy.
I’ve been critical of how companies like Meta and Google handle content moderation, but at least they have established processes for escalating threats. OpenAI doesn’t seem to have had any such process, or if it did, it wasn’t followed. The Wall Street Journal report suggests the decision was made at a high level, not by some low-level content moderator. That means Sam Altman or someone close to him likely signed off on this.
What happens now? The families are seeking damages, but more importantly, they’re pushing for accountability. If the courts find OpenAI liable, it could set a precedent that forces AI companies to take proactive safety measures instead of just paying lip service. It could also blow a hole in the IPO timeline, which is probably the only thing that would actually make the board sit up and pay attention.
I don’t know if this lawsuit will succeed. The legal landscape around AI liability is still murky, and companies have a lot of leeway when it comes to what they report to law enforcement. But I do know this: if you build a platform that people use to plan mass murder, and you see it happening, and you say nothing, you are complicit. That’s not a legal argument; it’s a human one.
OpenAI has not yet commented on the lawsuit beyond a standard “we take safety seriously” boilerplate. I hope they have more to say than that, because right now, silence is the last thing they should be offering.
Comments (0)
Login Log in to comment.
Be the first to comment!